Resistor ladder interpolation for subranging ADC

ABSTRACT

An analog to digital converter includes a resistive ladder outputting a plurality of reference voltages and a coarse ADC receiving the reference voltages and a voltage input. A plurality of coarse comparators receive an output of the coarse ADC. A switch matrix receives an output of the coarse ADC and the reference voltages. The switch matrix inputs a plurality of control signals for selecting at least two voltage subranges. A fine ADC receives the two voltage subranges and the voltage input. A plurality of fine comparators receive an output of the fine ADC. An encoder converts outputs of the coarse and fine comparators to a digital representation of the voltage input. The voltage subranges are adjacent. Each control signal includes a plurality of control lines for controlling corresponding switches. The switches are field effect transistors.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 10/926,407, Filed: Aug. 26, 2004, Titled: RESISTOR, LADDER, INTERPOLATION FOR, PGA AND, DAC, which is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 10/748,250, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,784,818, Filed: Dec. 31, 2003, Titled: ANALOG, TO, DIGITAL CONVERTER, WITH, INTERPOLATION, OF, REFERENCE, LADDER, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 10/158,774, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,697,005, Filed: May 31, 2002, Titled: ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERTER WITH INTERPOLATION OF REFERENCE LADDER, which is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 10/153,709, Filed: May 24, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,628,224, Titled: DISTRIBUTED AVERAGING ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERTER TOPOLOGY, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to reference ladders, and more particularly, to interpolation of reference ladder voltages for use in analog to digital converters (ADCs) programmable gain amplifiers (PGAs) and digital to analog converters (DACs).

2. Related Art

A subranging analog to digital converter (ADC) architecture is suitable for implementing high-performance ADC's (i.e. high speed, low power, low area, high resolution). FIG. 1 shows the generic two-step subranging architecture, comprising a reference ladder 104, a coarse ADC 102, a switching matrix 103, a fine ADC 105, coarse comparators 107, fine comparators 108 and an encoder 106. In most cases, a track-and-hold 101 is used in front of the ADC. In this architecture, an input voltage is first quantized by the coarse ADC 102. The coarse ADC 102 compares the input voltage against all the reference voltages, or against a subset of the reference voltages that is uniformly distributed across the whole range of reference voltages. Based on a coarse quantization, the switching matrix 103 connects the fine ADC 105 to a subset of the reference voltages (called a “subrange”) that is centered around the input signal voltage.

A flash ADC architecture is the most straightforward implementation of an analog-to-digital converter. Unfortunately, it is very inefficient in terms of area and power. In particular, an N-bit ADC requires 2^(N) comparators. Furthermore, it requires a reference ladder with 2^(N) taps, which generally causes a lot of wiring parasitic capacitance, slowing down the ADC.

A subranging ADC architecture is often used as a more power- and area-efficient alternative to the flash ADC architecture. While subranging does help to reduce the number of comparators, it does not help to reduce the number of taps on the reference ladder. In fact, the situation is complicated by the fact that subranging requires a switching matrix with a large number of switches. Parasitic capacitance associated with these switches slows down the ADC even further.

A conventional way of connecting the first row of amplifiers to the reference ladder is shown in FIG. 2: amplifier A1 connects to reference taps “2m” and “0”, amplifier A2 connects to a “2m−1” tap and a “1” tap, etc. Thus, in a “brute force” flash ADC, the reference ladder 104 has 2^(N)=2m taps (e.g., 1024 taps for N=10).

Three techniques have been published in the literature for decreasing the number of switches in subranging ADC's. First, interpolation between preamplifier output voltages is often used. Interpolation is often applied in both flash ADC's, subranging ADC's and folding ADC's. This form of interpolation reduces the number of amplifiers in a first array of amplifiers. Since only the first array of amplifiers needs connections to the reference ladder 104, this technique reduces the required number of reference taps and switches. For example, 4× interpolation within the fine ADC 105 reduces the number of switches by 75%.

A second technique for reducing the number of switches is referred to as “absolute value processing.” See B. P. Brandt and J. Lutsky. “A 75-mW, 10-b, 20-MSPS CMOS subranging ADC with 9.5 effective bits at Nyquist,” IEEE Jour. of Solid State Circ., 34(12):1788–1795 (December 1999). This technique uses the fact that the absolute value function can be implemented simply by a commutator, basically comprising only four switches. This technique reduces the required number of switches in the matrix 103 by another 50%. Note that this technique does not reduce the number of taps on the reference ladder 104.

A third technique called “multilevel tree decoding scheme” decreases the number of switches by 62.5%. (See, e.g., Ito et al., “A 10-bit 20 MS/s 3V Supply CMOS A/D converter,” IEEE J. of Solid State Circ., 29 (12):1532–36, December 1994) Note that this technique does not reduce the number of taps on the reference ladder 104.

For example, a 10-bit analog digital converter in a “brute force” flash type configuration would require 2¹⁰, or 1024 taps on the reference ladder, which is very awkward. Thus, the problem involves the total number of taps required from the reference ladder, as well as the number of switches in the switch matrix for a subranging analog digital converter. It is therefore desirable to reduce the number of taps, which reduces the amount of parasitic capacitance due to the connections involved.

Accordingly, a need exists for an ADC circuit topology that significantly reduces the number of switches and taps from the reference ladder 104.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to resistor ladder interpolation for subranging ADC that substantially obviates one or more of the problems and disadvantages of the related art.

To achieve these and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described, there is provided an analog to digital converter including a resistive ladder outputting a plurality of reference voltages and a coarse ADC receiving the reference voltages and a voltage input. A plurality of coarse comparators receive an output of the coarse ADC. A switch matrix receives an output of the coarse ADC and the reference voltages. The switch matrix inputs a plurality of control signals for selecting at least two voltage subranges. A fine ADC receives the two voltage subranges and the voltage input. A plurality of fine comparators receive an output of the fine ADC. An encoder converts outputs of the coarse and fine comparators to a digital representation of the voltage input. The voltage subranges are adjacent. Each control signal includes a plurality of control lines for controlling corresponding switches. The switches are field effect transistors.

Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 represents a generalized 2-step subranging an ADC architecture;

FIG. 2 illustrates a conventional way of connecting a first row of amplifiers to a reference ladder;

FIG. 3 illustrates an auto-zero amplifier used in the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a first technique for connecting amplifiers of the present invention to the reference ladder;

FIG. 5 illustrates the approach of FIG. 4 with split capacitor interpolation;

FIG. 6 illustrates the approach of FIG. 5 with interpolation of sampling capacitor outputs;

FIG. 7 illustrates a circuit diagram corresponding to the approach of FIG. 6;

FIG. 8 illustrates a reference ladder used in the present invention;

FIG. 9 illustrates capacitive interpolation as applied to a programmable gate array;

FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of interpolation where differential inputs are used;

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of active interpolation for a digital to analog converter.

FIGS. 12–13 illustrate a conventional switch matrix used in a subranging ADC; and

FIGS. 14–15 illustrate a switch matrix of the present invention used in a subranging ADC.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.

One of the disadvantages of the subranging ADC architecture is the large number of switches required, resulting in degraded high-frequency performance. This disclosure describes how the required number of switches can be significantly reduced by interpolation of the reference ladder. Three new interpolation techniques are proposed.

All three techniques accomplish interpolation of the reference ladder taps. Since all three techniques can be applied to both subranging and flash ADC's, for simplicity they will be illustrated with respect to the flash architecture, showing a reduction in reference ladder taps that can be accomplished. Note that for subranging architectures, a reduction in the required number of switches equals a reduction in number of reference taps.

The techniques are illustrated based on the auto-zero amplifier shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3 illustrates the structure of one of the amplifiers in an amplifier array A1, A2, A3 . . . of FIG. 4, discussed below. As shown in FIG. 3, a non-overlapping two-phase clock is used, with non-overlapping phases Φ₁ and Φ₂. At a “+” input of the amplifier, two NMOS transistors M1 and M2 are used, with a source of the transistor M2 being connected to the “+” input terminal, and a gate of the transistor M2 being connected to the clock phase Φ₂. The “+” and “−” inputs are connected to taps from the reference ladder 104.

A gate of the transistor M1 is driven by the clock phase Φ₁. The drains of the transistors M1 and M2 are tied together and connected to one side of a capacitor C+. A source of M1 is connected to the positive T/H 101 output, and a source of M7 is connected to the negative T/H 101 output. The gates of M1 and M7 are driven by Φ₁. The other side of the capacitor C+ is connected to a source of a transistor M3, and to a gate of a transistor M4. A gate of the transistor M3 is connected to the clock phase Φ₁. Drains of the transistors M3 and M4 are tied together and, through resistor R1, to a positive supply voltage V_(dd). A symmetrical structure is used for the “−” input, as shown in FIG. 3, using transistors M8, M7, M6 and M5, and a capacitor C−. The amplifier has differential outputs V_(OUT+), V_(OUT−). The dashed portion corresponds to the amplifier A1 shown in subsequent figures.

During clock phase Φ₁ the amplifier is in a reset mode and the sampling capacitors are charged to the value of the sampled voltage V_(sample). More specifically, on Φ₁, the transistors M1, M3, M5 and M7 are turned on. During the next clock phase, Φ₂, the transistors M2 and M8 are turned on, the amplifier is connected to the reference ladder 104 and the amplifier output voltage V_(OUT) equals: V_(OUT) =G·(V_(ref)−V_(sample)), where G is the voltage gain of the amplifier, V_(ref)=V_(+input)−V_(−input) and V_(sample)=V_(TH, pos)−V_(TH, neg), where V_(TH) is the differential output of the track and hold 101.

It will be appreciated that although the auto-zeroing amplifier of FIG. 3 is shown as using N channel MOSFET's, P channel MOSFET's can also be used. Note further that the track-and-hold 101 of FIG. 1 is typically a differential input and output amplifier that is connected to differential outputs of the track and hold amplifier 110, V_(TH, pos) and V_(TH, neg).

FIG. 4 illustrates a first interpolation technique, and shows that about 50% reduction in the number of taps can be obtained if only the positive or the negative reference input is changed when going from one amp to the next. That is, amplifier A1 in FIG. 4 connects to reference taps “m” and “0”, amplifier A2 connects to “m” and “1”, so that only the negative input changes from A1 to A2; amplifier A3 connects to “m−1” and “1”, etc. In other words, a reference ladder 104 has a plurality of taps V_(ref,0) through V_(ref,m). FIG. 4 also shows each of the amplifiers A1, A2, A3 . . . has a capacitor at each input. Thus, the amplifier A1 has a capacitor C1 at its “+” input, and capacitor C2 at its “−” input. The amplifier A2 has capacitor C3 at its “+” input, and capacitor C4 at its “−” input, and so on. The transistors M1, M2, M7 and M8 correspond to the transistors shown in FIG. 3 (and are only shown for the amplifier A1 for clarity). The capacitors C1, C2 correspond to the capacitors C−, C+ of FIG. 3.

As may be seen from FIG. 4, the amplifier A1 is connected to taps V_(ref,m) and V_(ref,0). The amplifier A2 is connected to V_(ref,m) and V_(ref,1). The amplifier A3 is connected to V_(ref,m−1) and V_(ref,1), and so forth. Comparing FIG. 2 with FIG. 4, in FIG. 4, neighboring amplifiers have only one of their inputs changed, compared to neighboring amplifier in FIG. 2, where both of the inputs are changed. In other words, with reference to FIG. 2, in FIG. 2 both the “+” inputs on the amplifiers A1 and A2 change (from V_(ref, 2m) to V_(ref,2m−1)) as well as the “−” inputs change (from V_(ref,0) to V_(ref,1)). In contrast, in FIG. 4, the “+” inputs of the amplifiers A1 and A2 are both the same (V_(ref,m)), while the “−” inputs of the amplifiers A1 and A2 change from V_(ref,0) to V_(ref,1). Thus, only one of the inputs changes when going from one amplifier to a neighboring amplifier.

It will be appreciated that the terms “adjacent” and “neighboring” are used in their hierarchical sense compared to the taps from the reference ladder 104, rather than in the sense of how the overall circuit is actually laid out. Thus, although an actual layout would most likely have the amplifiers A1, A2, A3 . . . laid out close to each other, this need not be the case.

It will be appreciated that unlike FIG. 2, which requires a total of 1024 taps for a 10-bit analog digital converter, e.g., 2^(N) in a “brute force” approach, the number of taps required for the circuit of FIG. 4 to operate is half that (or 2_(N)÷2). Note also that the 2^(N)÷2 figure assumes that no interpolation is used.

The proposed technique results in common-mode differences at the inputs of the amplifiers. This is only a minor disadvantage, since the amplifiers generally have good common-mode rejection and the common-mode differences are quite small.

The outputs of the amplifiers (or, if necessary, cascaded stages of amplifiers) are fed into a comparator array (not shown, see 108 of FIG. 1), and then to an encoder (not shown, see 106 of FIG. 1).

A second technique accomplishing reference ladder interpolation is illustrated in FIG. 5. Here, the input sampling capacitors C1, C2 . . . of the amplifiers A1, A2, A3 . . . are split into two parts, effectively providing each amplifier with two positive and two negative reference inputs. The capacitor C1 is split up into the capacitors C1 a and C1 b, and the capacitor C2 is split up into the capacitors C2 a and C2 b. The capacitor C3 is split up into capacitors C3 a and C3 b, the capacitor C4 is split up into capacitors C4 a and C4 b, and so on. The two positive reference inputs can be connected to different reference taps, thus implementing interpolation of the reference ladder 104. The same applies to the two negative reference inputs. As an example, the two positive reference inputs shown in FIG. 5 are connected to taps “m” and “m−1”. The “+” input of A2 is effectively connected to a “virtual” tap V_(ref, m−1/2). The “−” input is effectively connected to a “virtual” tap V_(ref,1/2). Thus, this interpolation technique allows an additional reduction of 50% in the number of tap lines from the reference ladder 104.

Note that in terms of circuit layout on a semiconductor substrate, it is easier to split up a capacitor into two smaller capacitors, rather than having more taps from a reference ladder, since the primary source of parasitics is the number of tap lines from the reference ladder 104. A reduction of tap lines therefore results in a reduction in parasitic capacitance associated with the additional tap lines.

It will also be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the interpolation approach of FIG. 5 does not require that the capacitors at the input of each amplifier be equal. Thus, the interpolation technique will work if each capacitor split up into capacitors having different values, as appropriate for the voltage required at the particular input of the amplifier. It will also be appreciated that each input capacitor can be split up into more than two capacitors, e.g., capacitor C3 may be split up into capacitors C3 a, C3 b, C3 c, although as each capacitor gets smaller, eventually the use of such small capacitors for interpolation will become problematic.

A third technique accomplishing reference ladder interpolation is illustrated in FIG. 6. FIG. 6 shows that not all input amplifiers need to be connected to the reference taps. Interpolation of the sampling capacitor “outputs” can be used to reduce the required number of reference taps. In the example shown in FIG. 6, a reduction of about 50% is obtained.

As may be seen from FIG. 6, not every amplifier in the amplifier array A1, A2, A3 . . . needs to have its own tap line, particularly where the adjacent, or neighboring, amplifier uses the same tap line. Thus, the “−” input of the amplifier A1, which in FIG. 4 is connected to V_(ref,0) tap, can be directly connected to the “+” input of the amplifier A2, which in FIG. 4 is also connected to the V_(ref,0) tap. Similarly, since the “+” input of A3 and the “−” input of the amplifier A2 are connected to the same voltage V_(ref,m−1) tap, the “−” input of the amplifier A2 does not require its own tap, but can be directly connected to the “+” input of the amplifier A3. This will further reduce the number of tap lines and tap connections from the reference ladder to the amplifier array. The technique shown in FIG. 6 may be referred to as “interpolate by 2” technique, which results in a 50% reduction in the overall number of tap connections. It also results in the elimination of approximately half of the input capacitors, compared to the technique shown in FIG. 4.

FIG. 7 illustrates the approach of FIG. 6 in more detail and shows the three amplifiers A1, A2, A3 of FIG. 6 (without the switches driven by the two phase clock). The A1 and A3 amplifiers have their own input capacitors (C1, C2, and C5, C6, respectively), the A1 amplifier has differential inputs V_(ref,m)/V_(ref,0), the amplifier A3 has differential inputs V_(ref,m−1)/V_(ref,1). The amplifier A2 does not have its own input capacitors. Instead, the amplifier A2 comprises two differential transistor pairs M4, M6 (both half the size of the differential pairs M4, M6 of A1 and A3). It's current sources are each half of the current source of A1 or A3. Gates of one of the transistor pairs M4, M6 connect to the gates of the corresponding transistors of the A1 amplifier, and gates of the other differential transistor pair M4, M6 connect to corresponding gates of transistors of the A3 amplifier. The drain currents of the two differential transistor pairs of A2 are summed. As a result, the output of the amplifier A2 (V_(OUT,2)) is (approximately) equal to the average of the outputs of A1 and A3 (i.e., the average of V_(OUT,1) and V_(OUT,3)).

The reference ladder interpolation techniques described here can be applied to various types of ADC architectures. In flash and folding ADC architectures, they can be used to reduce the number of taps on the reference ladder 104. In subranging ADC architectures, they reduce both the number of reference taps and the number of switches.

It will be appreciated by one with ordinary skill in the art that techniques described herein are applicable to both flash type ADC's, folding ADC's and subranging ADC's.

FIG. 8 illustrates a reference ladder arrangement of one embodiment of the present invention. The reference ladder 104 includes a plurality of 65Ω resistors which are connected to a relatively slow amplifier 801. (The bandwidth of the amplifier 801 as approximately 1–2 MHz). The output of the amplifier 801 is also tied to its “−” input, and to a transistor 802, whose both source and drain are tied to ground, forming a 22 pF capacitor.

All three techniques can be applied at the same time, in order to obtain a very significant reduction in the number of reference taps and matrix switches.

For example, for an N=9 bit ADC, the reduction in number of taps is as follows:

full flash for N = 9: 512 taps (2^(N)) 2x capacitive interpolation at ladder: 256 taps (2^(N−1)) change V_(ref,p) or V_(ref,n) only: 128 taps (2^(N−2)) 2x interpolation of the “outputs”  64 taps (2^(N−3)) of the sampling caps 4x split differential pair interpolation:  16 taps (2^(N−5)) edge effect (add one or two):  17 taps

The table below illustrates the tap voltages for the 17-tap case:

Tap # Tap voltage 16 0.95 15 0.90625 14 0.8625 13 0.81875 12 0.775 11 0.73125 10 0.6875 9 0.64375 8 0.6 7 0.55625 6 0.5125 5 0.46875 4 0.425 3 0.38125 2 0.3375 1 0.29375 0 0.25

In the description above, a resistive ladder was used for voltage interpolation in the context of analog converters. However, the interpolation approach discussed herein is also applicable to other circuits, for example, programmable gate arrays (PGAs) and digital to analog converters (DACs). The advantage of this approach for PGAs and DACs is the same, i.e., reducing the number of voltage taps from the resistive ladder, and consequently, reduction in the number of resistors necessary in the resistive ladder. This has the advantage of reducing the amount of real estate on the integrated circuit that is taken up by the resistive ladder.

FIG. 9 illustrates capacitive interpolation as applied to a programmable gate array. As shown in FIG. 9, a resistive ladder includes five resistors 901A–901E. (It will be appreciated that the invention is not limited to any particular number of resistors in the resistive ladder.) Two capacitors C902A and C902B are at the input of an amplifier 903, which outputs an output voltage V_(OUT). The resistive ladder includes a number of taps, which are connected to the capacitors C902A, C902B through switches S1A, S1B through S5A, S5B, as shown in FIG. 9.

The switches S1A–S5B can be digitally controlled, to result in a large number of possible interpolated voltages, compared to a conventional resistive ladder, which has just the voltage taps (essentially, a resistor divider network). The circuit in FIG. 9 may be viewed as an example of a programmable gain amplifier with a capacitive coupling to a buffer amplifier.

FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of a PGA or a DAC, where differential inputs are used. In essence, two resistive ladders such as shown in FIG. 9, are used in this circuit, one for the positive input V_(IN,POS), and one for the negative input V_(IN,NEG). Two amplifiers 903A, 903B (corresponding to the differential analog of the single amplifier 903 shown in FIG. 9) are used. These amplifiers are connected in the same manner to their respective resistive ladders, as shown in FIG. 9 (these connections are not shown in FIG. 10 for simplicity). As shown in the lower half of FIG. 10, by changing the connections from the taps to the buffer amplifiers 903A, 903B, the output voltages V_(OUT,POS) and V_(OUT,NEG), can be interpolated (in other words, going from a set of connections shown in position 1 to a set of connections shown in position 2 in FIG. 10). In the example shown in FIG. 10, when going from one position to the next, only the “tap” position of the positive or the negative buffer amplifier 903A, 903B is changed. This in effect reduces the number of taps required by a factor of 2. Note that this circuit can be used both in a programmable gain amplifier (when having a varying input signal), or in a DAC (when having a DC reference input signal). In the case of a DAC, the capacitors C902A, C902B would be omitted, since the voltages from the taps are DC voltages.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of active interpolation for a digital to analog converter. Similar to FIG. 9, a resistive ladder comprising a number of resistors (in this case, 901A–901E) is used, with a number of taps between the resistors 901A–901E. The taps are connected through switches S1A–S5B to two transistors M1101A, M1101B (e.g., MOSFET transistors, or bi-polar transistors), as shown in FIG. 11. The switches S1A–S5B are digitally controlled, to be “on” or “off”, to provide a particular gate voltage on the gates of the transistors M1101A, M1101B. In the simplest case, only one of the switches is “on”, effectively making the resistor ladder a resistor divider. However, by combining several switches, an interpolated voltage may be applied to the gates. A current source 1102 is also used, in combination with the interpolated gate voltages, to generate an interpolated output voltage V_(OUT).

In the subranging ADC, the ‘switch matrix’ 103 is essentially a big multiplexer that selects a subset of differential reference voltages (swop-swon) from the set of reference ladder voltages. FIG. 12 illustrates such a conventional switch matrix 103 used in a subranging ADC. For instance, in the 8 bit subranging ADC, 3 different differential reference voltages are selected out of the 17 voltages from the resistor ladder. These selected voltages are used as the reference inputs to the fine ADC 105 of the subranging ADC. The switch matrix 103 is controlled by (in this case) 15 control signals (‘cntrl’); during the clock phase that the fine ADC 105 connects to the reference ladder, only one of these control signals is high.

For example, the 8 bit subranging ADC has 15 cntrl signals, which means that a total of 90 switches are required in the switch matrix 103. The description of the switch matrix 103 is shown in the box in FIG. 12, and is further illustrated in FIG. 13. Note that the switches for ‘swop’ and ‘swon’ are controlled by the same control signals.

A method and circuit is proposed to reduce the number of switches used in the switch matrix 103. FIG. 14 illustrates a switch matrix 103 of the present invention used in the subranging ADC. This approach has advantages of using 2× fewer switches inside the switch matrix 103, and 2× smaller drivers for the ‘cntrl’ signals.

The proposed switch matrix 103, for the 8 b ADC, is shown in FIG. 14.

In the proposed switch matrix 103, the ‘swop’ and ‘swon’ signals are controlled by separate control signals (‘cntrl_p’ and ‘cntrl_n’), as further illustrated in FIG. 15. (Note that swop<1>, swop<0>, swon<1>, swon<0> are not shown in this figure.)

During the clock phase when the fine ADC 105 connects to the resistor ladder, only one cntrl_p and one cntrl_n signal is high. Each cntrl_p/cntrl_n signal is high for two consecutive subranges. Therefore, one set of reference voltages (in this case, three references voltages), and therefore also set of switches (in this case, three switches), is used in two consecutive subranges (as illustrated by the grey color in FIG. 14). Phrased another way, the switch matrix 103 inputs control signals for selecting at least two voltage subranges at substantially the same time. Hence, since all switches can be used twice, the total number of switches is halved (to 48 switches, vs. 90 in FIG. 13), resulting in using less area. It also results in lower parasitics, which in turn means higher bandwidth for the overall ADC.

Note that the use of the proposed method and circuit can result in a small difference in common-mode voltages between two consecutive subranges. The difference equals

${{\Delta\;{V{cm}}} = \frac{V_{{ref},\max}}{2^{M + 1}}},$ where M is the number of bits in the coarse ADC, and V_(ref,max) is the maximum ADC input voltage. For instance, for a 5 bit coarse ADC and V_(ref,max)=1.4V, ΔVcm=22 mV. This value is sufficiently small to be handled by the fine ADC 105 amplifiers.

Note also that the switch matrix as described herein is applicable not just to subranging ADCs, but also to PGAs and DACs.

CONCLUSION

It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents. 

1. An analog to digital converter (ADC) comprising: a resistive ladder outputting a plurality of reference voltages by means of m number of taps wherein m is determined by m=2^(N−1) for an N-bit ADC; a first ADC receiving the plurality of reference voltages and a voltage input; a first plurality of comparators receiving an output of the first ADC; a switch matrix receiving an output of the first ADC and the reference voltages, a second ADC receiving the at least two reference voltages and the voltage input; a second plurality of comparators receiving an output of the second ADC; and an encoder converting outputs of the first and second comparators to a digital representation of the voltage input.
 2. The analog to digital converter of claim 1, wherein the the reference voltages from the resistive ladder are not necessarily from adjacent taps.
 3. The analog to digital converter of claim 1, wherein said switch matrix can select at least two reference voltages at the same time.
 4. The analog to digital converter of claim 1, wherein all switches in said switch matrix are used twice to reduce the area used on chip.
 5. A method for interpolation of reference ladder voltages for use in analog to digital converters (ADCs) comprising: outputting a range of reference voltages by means of m number of taps from a resistor ladder wherein m is determined by m=2^(N−1) for an N-bit ADC receiving the reference voltages and a voltage input to a first ADC; connecting at least two of said m number of taps to a plurality of capacitors wherein at least two capacitors are of unequal values, and at least two of said m number of taps are not adjacent to each other; outputting the capacitor voltages to at least two coarse comparators; receiving an output of the first ADC and the reference voltages as an input to a switch matrix; receiving at least two reference voltages and a voltage input into a second ADC; inputting the output of the second ADC to a plurality of fine comparators; and encoding the outputs of the fine and coarse comparators.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said first ADC is a coarse ADC.
 7. The method of claim 5, wherein said second ADC is a fine ADC.
 8. The method of claim 5, wherein said switch matrix can select at least two reference voltages at the same time. 